Home Link Free Stuff Link Blog Link Buy Music Link Music Videos Link Photos Link Band Bio Link Contact Link

Friday, March 11, 2011

The only Beatles cover I actually like

In true Finding Jupiter fashion, I'm doing my two Beatles posts back-to-back.

I've always hated Beatles covers. Usually, they suck---whether they try to reimagine the song (the whole "Across the Universe" movie, which I couldn't stand) or just copy it (Eddie Veder's "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away").

There's just something about the Beatles that you can't copy---as the Golden Standard for rock, maybe there's just no way to do it right.

But there's ONE Beatles cover that I love: The Vines' version of "I'm Only Sleeping," from the "I Am Sam" soundtrack.

The original was way ahead of its time, anticipating the psychedelia that was just around the corner. Sure, it made the song visionary, but it also kept the Beatles from pushing it as far as it could go.

With all the benefit of a few decades of musical development, the Vines take it and do wonders. I honestly think the Beatles would be proud. But you can judge for yourself:





-Dean

Monday, March 7, 2011

I'm so tired, and the Beatles

One of the great things about the Beatles (sorry, Taylor) is that, no matter what mood you're in, chances are that you can find a Beatles song that fits it perfectly.

Right now, I'm exhausted. Final projects. No sleep. Etc. John Lennon said it best:

I'm so tired
I don't know what to do.
...
I'd give you everything I've got
For a little peace of mind.



Yes, there's also a frustrated-romance component to "I'm So Tired," but I just love the way it feels--exhaustion combined with angst combined with a touch of insanity. Such a classic, and a great companion to "I'm Only Sleeping" (expect a post on that from me some other time, perhaps).

-Dean

Friday, March 4, 2011

An Alanis Morissette Case Study: A Lesson in Bass Playing Intangibles

What's up rock stars,

To play bass guitar in a rock band is to choose a profession whose legitimacy and necessity are constantly under question. Bass parts in 60% of all rock songs are actually mind-numbing. Often times the bass player is viewed as the person who just wasn't good enough at guitar.

Even worse, bands like the White Stripes and Guster find success without employing a bass player whatsoever, and that's why they'll always suck just a little bit. It's enough to make one turn towards nihilism.

A sort-of-known fact about Alanis Morissette's first album is that Flea, of Red Hot Chili Peppers fame and one of the best in the business, actually laid down the bass track for "You Oughta Know" while the bass on "You Learn" comes from someone uncredited, probably a producer. Here are the tracks for comparison.



You Oughta Know (embedding disabled, sorry)

Now, the bass playing on "You Learn" is quite proficient. It's very even, measured, but creative as well. It aptly serves its function. On "You Oughta Know," though, Flea almost takes over the entire song. He's always exactly on the beat, but he's all over the place, doing stuff that 85% of bass players would never even think of.

More importantly though, he elevates the song as a whole. His seemingly random octave jumps and rhythmic variations add an extra air of uncertainty to the song; he makes Alanis sound crazier. But also, especially in the chorus, he is throwing down on the chorus, his sound has an authority and intensity that can only come out of his approach to the instrument, and you can feel it even if you're listening on cheap-ass headphones with the treble turned up, and it really sells the level of anger Alanis is trying to bring to the song. Does it get nominated for Song of the Year and become a '90s rock staple if the bass player was the dude from "You Learn"? Probably not.

Just think about that the next time you marvel at the musical genius of bass-less Explosions in the Sky.